Why Private School Cleaning Is Different from Public School Cleaning

A clean school isn’t just about appearances—it’s a powerful driver of student health, attendance, and academic success.

Introduction: Why School Hygiene and Sanitation Matter

A clean school environment is critical for protecting student health and ensuring consistent attendance.

Whether public or private, the quality of hygiene, sanitation, and environmental health services directly impacts academic performance and disease prevention.

What is School Hygiene and Sanitation?

School hygiene and sanitation refer to the infrastructure, practices, and policies that promote a clean, safe, and healthy learning environment. This includes:

• Access to safe drinking water
• Functional, clean toilets and handwashing stations
• Waste management systems
• Regular cleaning protocols for classrooms and surfaces
• Education on personal hygiene practices

Why Is It Important for Students?

Poor hygiene and sanitation in schools can lead to:

• Increased risk of infectious diseases, such as diarrhea, skin infections, and respiratory illnesses
• Higher rates of absenteeism, especially among younger children and adolescent girls
• Reduced concentration and academic performance
• Unsafe or uncomfortable learning environments

Public vs. Private Schools: What’s the Difference?

Public and private schools often differ in their approach and capacity to maintain hygiene and sanitation due to:

• Funding levels and resource allocation
• Policy enforcement and health oversight
• Facility age and maintenance schedules
• Cultural expectations and parental involvement

Purpose of This Analysis

This section sets the foundation for a data-driven comparison by answering:

• How do public and private schools differ in sanitation infrastructure and hygiene practices?
• What are the implications of those differences for student health and learning?
• Where do critical gaps exist—and how can they be improved?

By understanding these distinctions, schools and policymakers can identify practical, evidence-based strategies to promote health equity across educational settings.

 

Infrastructure and Physical Environment

The foundation of school hygiene and sanitation begins with infrastructure.

The physical condition of school facilities plays a vital role in disease prevention and student well-being.

Toilet Availability and Accessibility

A major difference between public and private schools lies in toilet access and conditions:

• Private schools typically offer more toilets per student and maintain gender-separated, lockable, and clean facilities.
• Public schools often experience overcrowded toilets, with some schools reporting ratios exceeding 1 toilet per 90+ students.
• Inadequate facilities may result in open defecation or students avoiding restroom use altogether.

Poor toilet access contributes to absenteeism, especially among menstruating girls, and increases the risk of urinary tract infections and related health issues.

Water Supply Systems

Reliable water access is essential for:

• Handwashing
• Toilet flushing
• Drinking needs

Key infrastructure disparities:

• Private schools generally use boreholes, treated water systems, or municipal taps with consistent access.
• Public schools may rely on seasonal or untreated sources, including wells or shared community taps, which increases contamination risks.

Intermittent water access undermines hygiene practices and forces schools to adopt unsafe coping methods.

Handwashing Stations and Hygiene Facilities

Effective hand hygiene requires:

• Accessible handwashing stations with soap and water
• Proper drainage systems
• Regular supply replenishment

Private schools are more likely to:

• Maintain dedicated handwashing areas near toilets and cafeterias
• Keep soap and drying materials stocked

Public schools often:

• Lack soap
• Have broken or unsanitary stations
• Face challenges due to budget constraints and maintenance delays

Without functional hygiene stations, even the best hygiene education efforts fail in practice.

Waste Management and Cleanliness

Daily cleaning and proper disposal of waste are core to a safe environment. Common issues include:

• Public schools frequently use open dumping or on-site burning, contributing to air pollution and vermin.
• Private schools are more likely to contract professional services for regular waste collection.

Additional differences:

• Availability of bins in classrooms and hallways
• Frequency and thoroughness of daily cleaning routines
• Maintenance of common surfaces and high-contact areas

Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality

Indoor air quality (IAQ) affects respiratory health and cognitive function. Key infrastructure indicators:

• Private schools often lack centralized IAQ programs but may have better-maintained classrooms and HVAC systems.
• Public schools typically implement more policies on IAQ but may face delayed maintenance and outdated infrastructure.

Poor IAQ has been linked to higher rates of asthma, allergies, and school absenteeism.

By evaluating these core infrastructure components, stakeholders can better understand how environmental conditions differ between public and private schools and how these differences contribute to student health outcomes.

 

Hygiene and Sanitation Practices

Even with the right infrastructure, school hygiene depends on consistent, safe, and supervised sanitation practices.

This section highlights how public and private schools differ in executing daily hygiene routines and behavior management.

Handwashing Behavior and Supervision

Proper hand hygiene is a proven defense against the spread of infections. The effectiveness depends on:

• Frequency of handwashing before meals and after toilet use
• Use of soap and clean water
• Supervision by teachers or staff, especially for younger students

Private schools are more likely to:

• Reinforce handwashing through routine schedules and visual reminders
• Assign staff to monitor compliance
• Conduct awareness sessions during health classes

Public schools often struggle with:

• Inconsistent supervision
• Limited soap and water availability
• Fewer hygiene education interventions

Gaps in daily hygiene enforcement lead to higher disease transmission rates, particularly in shared environments.

Restroom Cleanliness and Maintenance

Restroom condition reflects a school’s commitment to student health and dignity. Key differences include:

• Private schools usually maintain daily cleaning schedules, ensuring restrooms are sanitized and stocked.
• Public schools may clean restrooms infrequently or only once per day due to staff shortages and budget limits.

Signs of insufficient restroom care:

• Foul odors, blocked toilets, and visible waste
• Lack of soap, toilet paper, or drying materials
• Broken locks, taps, or doors affecting privacy and safety

Unclean restrooms discourage students—especially girls—from using the facilities, increasing health risks and absenteeism.

Availability of Sanitation Supplies

Basic sanitation supplies support infection prevention, but access varies widely:

Private schools often stock:

• Liquid soap or soap bars
• Paper towels or hand dryers
• Covered waste bins

Public schools frequently report:

• Missing or empty dispensers
• Reused cloths or lack of drying methods
• Shared, uncovered bins prone to overflow

When supplies are unavailable or poorly maintained, students cannot follow hygiene protocols—even if they know them.

Cleaning Staff and Daily Protocols

Sanitation effectiveness relies on the workforce tasked with executing routines. Key differences:

• Private schools typically employ trained cleaning staff or outsource to commercial cleaning companies
• Public schools rely on in-house custodial staff, often overburdened with too many classrooms and limited tools

Common responsibilities include:

• Sweeping and mopping classrooms
• Disinfecting high-touch surfaces (desks, doorknobs, sinks)
• Emptying trash and replenishing hygiene supplies

Insufficient staffing leads to skipped tasks and buildup of contaminants over time.

Student Engagement in Cleanliness

Behavioral reinforcement helps embed hygiene into the school culture. Schools may encourage:

• Cleanliness contests or classroom duties
• Posters and hygiene pledges
• Peer monitoring systems

Private schools tend to integrate these practices more consistently, while public schools may lack the time, resources, or staff training to do the same.

Consistent hygiene practices are essential for reducing illness and creating a safe, supportive learning environment.

The disparities in execution between public and private schools underscore the need for targeted support, supervision, and community engagement.

 

 

Disease Risk and Bacterial Exposure

Schools that lack consistent hygiene and sanitation practices become breeding grounds for pathogenic microorganisms.

The resulting health risks significantly affect both student well-being and school performance.

High-Touch Surfaces and Contamination

Classroom surfaces accumulate bacteria quickly, especially in shared environments. Common contamination points include:

• Desk surfaces and shared tables
• Toilet handles, taps, and door knobs
• Chairs, light switches, and hallway railings
• Shared equipment (lab tools, sports gear, computer keyboards)

Public schools, particularly those with limited cleaning staff or irregular routines, report higher levels of bacterial contamination.

Private schools, though not immune, tend to:

• Perform routine disinfection
• Use stronger commercial-grade cleaners
• Maintain tighter control over shared equipment sanitation

Studies show that certain bacteria—like Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, and Enterobacter—are more prevalent in public school environments, particularly on high-contact surfaces.

Common School-Based Infections

Without adequate cleaning and personal hygiene, schools become hotspots for:

• Gastrointestinal infections (diarrhea, dysentery, foodborne illnesses)
• Skin infections (impetigo, boils, ringworm)
• Respiratory illnesses (influenza, bronchitis, sore throat)
• Parasitic infections (worms, lice, scabies)

These infections spread rapidly through:

• Touching contaminated surfaces
• Inadequate handwashing
• Sharing food, supplies, or water bottles

Disease outbreaks in schools often result in mass absenteeism and even temporary school closures.

Impact on Attendance and Academic Performance

Sickness-related absenteeism directly affects:

• Learning continuity
• Academic performance
• Standardized test results and graduation rates

Key insights:

• Students in schools with poor hygiene experience more sick days per semester
• Girls, especially during menstruation, are more likely to miss class when facilities are inadequate
• Teachers and staff are also at risk, compounding learning disruptions

Even short-term exposure to unsanitary conditions can lead to long-term health issues and learning setbacks.

Disinfectant Resistance and Ineffective Cleaning

Over-reliance on low-grade cleaning products or improper use of disinfectants can lead to:

• Surface bacteria developing resistance
• Incomplete removal of microbial biofilms
• False sense of safety among staff and students

Private schools generally have access to:

• Higher-quality disinfectants
• Training for proper dilution and use
• Scheduled deep-cleaning cycles

Public schools often:

• Rely on generic or diluted cleaning agents
• Have inconsistent protocols
• Lack proper safety data sheets (SDS) and cleaner handling education

Inadequate cleaning doesn’t just fail to prevent infection—it can create conditions for stronger, more resilient pathogens.

Differences in cleanliness and microbial control between public and private schools lead to measurable health disparities.

Recognizing these risks is the first step toward reducing disease transmission and protecting students, staff, and communities.

 

Policy Implementation and Oversight

Effective hygiene and sanitation in schools rely not just on infrastructure or behavior—but on strong policy enforcement, regular oversight, and institutional accountability.

The presence or absence of these elements often defines the difference between public and private school environments.

Health and Safety Policies in Practice

Both public and private schools may have formal health and safety policies, but implementation and consistency vary widely.

Public schools typically have:

• Government-mandated health guidelines covering hygiene, sanitation, and infection control
• Structured policy documents and compliance reporting systems
• Access to public health partnerships for inspections and health education

Private schools may:

• Operate with more autonomy in developing or adapting policies
• Rely on internal administrative standards or outsourced cleaning contracts
• Lack visibility or accountability to local health departments unless required by law

A policy is only effective when staff are trained to implement it and administrators are held accountable.

Staff Training and Awareness

Trained personnel are essential for upholding hygiene protocols and responding to health threats.

Key training differences:

• Public schools may offer state-sponsored workshops on hygiene practices, waste handling, and pandemic response, though not always uniformly delivered.
• Private schools often rely on vendor training or internal protocols, which can range from highly specialized to nonexistent.

Important areas of staff training include:

• Safe chemical use and dilution
• Correct cleaning techniques for high-touch areas
• Procedures for illness outbreaks and isolation
• Emergency response drills (e.g., for norovirus, HFMD, COVID-19)

Lack of training can result in improper sanitation, health hazards, and liability for school leadership.

Monitoring and Compliance Oversight

Oversight determines whether policies are being followed effectively.

Public school oversight typically includes:

• Scheduled inspections by education or health departments
• Facility audits for water, sanitation, and food safety
• Documentation and corrective action plans

Private school oversight depends on:

• Internal reviews or third-party contractor evaluations
• School board or management company requirements
• Local regulatory enforcement (if applicable)

Without routine monitoring, even well-written policies are rarely followed with fidelity.

Crisis Preparedness and Response Protocols

Recent health crises have highlighted the need for proactive infection control systems in schools.

Key elements of effective preparedness:

• Outbreak response protocols (isolation rooms, parental notification)
• Health screening policies for students and staff
• Supply chain plans for sanitation materials
• Continuity of operations plans (in case of closures)

Private schools may implement flexible or custom-built protocols.

Public schools are generally expected to follow standardized emergency health procedures issued by the state or district.

Schools without clear and rehearsed response strategies are slower to act and less effective at containing health threats.

Strong policy implementation ensures that hygiene standards are not dependent on individual staff efforts or reactive decisions.

While public schools often benefit from structured oversight, private schools must actively build and monitor their own systems to ensure compliance and student safety.

 

Funding and Resource Allocation

One of the most significant contributors to disparities in school sanitation and hygiene is the difference in available funding and how those resources are allocated.

Funding affects everything—from infrastructure and cleaning staff to supply procurement and emergency preparedness.

Budget Differences Between Public and Private Schools

Private schools often have:

• Tuition-based revenue, allowing greater control over spending
• Flexible budgets for upgrades, equipment, and vendor contracts
• More opportunities for donor funding or parent association contributions

Public schools operate on:

• Government-issued budgets, which may vary by district and region
• Fixed annual allocations, sometimes delayed or reduced due to economic factors
• Competing priorities, such as academics, transportation, and staffing

Budget limitations in public schools frequently result in deferred maintenance, inadequate staffing, and minimal investment in sanitation infrastructure.

Staffing and Cleaning Resources

The number and quality of cleaning personnel directly correlate with school hygiene levels.

• Private schools may hire trained custodial teams or outsource cleaning to professional contractors. These teams often follow industry standards and receive regular training.
• Public schools typically rely on in-house custodial staff, who are often underpaid, undertrained, and expected to manage more space per person.

Key challenges in public schools:

• High student-to-custodian ratios
• Limited access to modern cleaning tools and PPE
• Overtime restrictions and scheduling conflicts

Without adequate personnel and tools, routine cleaning and disinfection suffer, regardless of intent or policy.

Cleaning Supplies and Equipment Procurement

Reliable access to quality sanitation products is essential—but not equal.

Private schools generally maintain:

• Regular vendor contracts for cleaning supplies
• Stockpiles of high-quality disinfectants, soap, paper towels, and PPE
• Budget flexibility to upgrade tools and technology (e.g., HEPA vacuums, electrostatic sprayers)

Public schools often face:

• Inconsistent supply chains due to procurement bureaucracy
• Use of low-cost or bulk cleaning agents with lower efficacy
• Frequent shortages of soap, paper, and disinfectants

Many public schools rely on donations or emergency funds to meet basic sanitation needs, especially during outbreaks or budget cuts.

Facility Maintenance and Capital Improvements

Over time, wear and tear erode the effectiveness of even the best-designed facilities.

Private schools are more likely to invest in:

• Renovated restrooms and ventilation systems
• New handwashing stations and touch-free fixtures
• Energy-efficient and sanitary flooring and wall materials

Public schools, particularly older campuses, often:

• Delay capital repairs due to funding constraints
• Operate with obsolete plumbing or broken fixtures
• Prioritize essential repairs over cleanliness-related upgrades

Long-term neglect of infrastructure reduces the impact of even well-implemented cleaning protocols.

Funding Flexibility and Crisis Response

During health emergencies, the ability to respond quickly depends on how funds can be used.

• Private schools typically have discretionary spending authority, enabling rapid procurement of supplies and services
• Public schools may require multiple approvals, delaying critical purchases during outbreaks

In emergency scenarios, funding agility can determine whether a school prevents an outbreak—or becomes the source of one.

Funding is the backbone of operational capacity. While public schools often work with restricted and regulated budgets, private schools have the advantage of financial flexibility, faster decision-making, and access to higher-quality resources—directly influencing the quality and consistency of sanitation services.

 

Educational and Cultural Influences

Clean and healthy schools require more than just infrastructure and funding—they also depend on a culture of hygiene awareness, responsibility, and behavioral reinforcement.

Educational approaches and cultural attitudes play a pivotal role in shaping student and staff habits.

Hygiene as a Core Educational Value

In many schools, hygiene is not just taught—it’s modeled and reinforced as a social expectation.

Private schools are more likely to:

• Incorporate health and hygiene education into formal curricula
• Use visual cues and posters to reinforce personal cleanliness
• Promote hygiene as part of character development and etiquette

Public schools often have hygiene content embedded in health or life sciences but may face:

• Limited class time or overcrowded syllabi
• Inconsistent reinforcement outside the classroom
• Lack of materials or training to deliver behavior-based health education

When hygiene is treated as a value rather than a rule, students are more likely to internalize and apply it consistently.

Role of Teachers and Administrators

Educators and leaders set the tone for hygiene culture in schools.

In high-performing environments:

• Teachers model proper hygiene (e.g., handwashing, mask use, tidiness)
• Principals and administrators enforce cleanliness policies and allocate resources
• Staff actively monitor and guide student behavior

Challenges in many public schools include:

• Staff burnout or high student-teacher ratios, reducing attention to hygiene behavior
• Limited authority or training to intervene in sanitation-related issues
• Inconsistent role modeling due to lack of institutional support

Leadership engagement is critical. When teachers and staff participate in hygiene routines, students are far more likely to follow suit.

Student Participation and Ownership

Student engagement drives long-term hygiene improvements.

Private schools often integrate:

• Clean-up rotations or “classroom job” systems
• Cleanliness awards, competitions, or peer-monitoring groups
• Encouragement of personal responsibility for keeping areas tidy

Public schools, when resourced and supported, may implement:

• Health clubs or sanitation ambassadors
• Group activities during national health weeks
• Classroom-led cleanliness campaigns

Giving students a stake in their environment transforms hygiene from a rule into a shared value.

Parental Expectations and Community Norms

Family and community culture influence hygiene behavior before children ever enter school.

• Parents of private school students may place higher expectations on cleanliness due to tuition investment and school branding
• Public school families, particularly in low-income or rural areas, may face barriers to hygiene at home, such as water scarcity or lack of sanitation products

These upstream differences affect:

• Children’s baseline hygiene habits
• Reinforcement of behaviors outside school
• Community engagement with school sanitation efforts

Bridging cultural gaps requires both school-level education and community outreach.

Barriers to Cultural Change

Changing hygiene behavior at scale is difficult without addressing root challenges:

• Generational norms around cleanliness and illness
• Resistance to new routines or enforcement
• Lack of culturally appropriate materials and methods
• Language barriers in diverse communities

Sustainable hygiene cultures depend on long-term education, inclusive strategies, and reinforcement at school, home, and community levels.

Educational and cultural influences are the invisible force behind every successful hygiene program.

Where values are taught, modeled, and reinforced, sanitation practices become sustainable habits—protecting health and supporting academic success.

 

Recommendations

Addressing hygiene and sanitation disparities between public and private schools requires targeted, scalable, and sustainable solutions.

The following recommendations are designed to help school administrators, policymakers, and stakeholders take immediate and long-term action.

1. Strengthen Hygiene Infrastructure in Public Schools

• Prioritize upgrades to toilets, handwashing stations, and water sources in budget allocations
• Ensure gender-segregated, private, and functional facilities in all schools
• Install touch-free taps, soap dispensers, and drying systems to reduce cross-contamination

2. Expand Funding and Procurement Flexibility

• Allocate dedicated sanitation budgets at the district or school level
• Enable rapid purchasing of cleaning supplies during health emergencies
• Encourage public-private partnerships to fund hygiene initiatives and upgrades

3. Professionalize Cleaning Operations

• Implement certified training programs for custodial staff in both public and private schools
• Encourage public schools to contract professional cleaning vendors when feasible
• Standardize cleaning checklists and accountability frameworks for routine tasks

4. Integrate Hygiene Education Into Curriculum

• Embed age-appropriate hygiene lessons across multiple grade levels
• Use interactive methods, such as posters, pledges, and hands-on demonstrations
• Involve students in cleanliness roles and peer-led campaigns to reinforce behavior

5. Improve Monitoring, Oversight, and Policy Enforcement

• Conduct regular audits of sanitation conditions in all schools
• Mandate compliance with national WASH and IAQ standards
• Develop public dashboards or transparency reports on school hygiene performance

6. Engage Families and Communities

• Organize parent workshops and school sanitation committees
• Promote hygiene values at home to reinforce school-based behavior
• Encourage community participation in facility maintenance and monitoring

7. Build Crisis-Ready Health Protocols

• Develop custom health response plans for each school
• Stock and rotate emergency sanitation kits
• Train staff in infection control, isolation protocols, and communication procedures

These recommendations aim to close the hygiene and sanitation gap between public and private schools while protecting the health, safety, and educational outcomes of all students—regardless of where they learn.

 

How Outsourcing Solves Sanitation and Hygiene Challenges in Private Schools

Private schools often maintain higher expectations for cleanliness, but many still face internal limitations—including inconsistent quality, rising costs, and lack of specialized staff.

Outsourcing janitorial and environmental health services to professional cleaning providers is a proven solution that improves outcomes, ensures compliance, and enhances parent satisfaction.

1. Professional Expertise and Standardization

Outsourced cleaning vendors bring specialized experience and industry-standard operating procedures, which help schools:

• Implement evidence-based cleaning protocols for classrooms, restrooms, labs, cafeterias, and high-touch surfaces
• Maintain consistent infection control standards aligned with CDC and local health guidelines
• Schedule routine deep-cleaning cycles and disinfection of problem areas

Schools benefit from a level of technical expertise and quality control not typically available with in-house teams.

2. Improved Resource Management and Cost Efficiency

Hiring, training, and equipping an internal janitorial team can become expensive and inefficient. Outsourcing solves this by:

• Providing bundled labor, equipment, and supplies under a single contract
• Reducing the need for schools to purchase or store chemicals, PPE, or machines
• Converting fixed payroll and HR costs into scalable operational expenses

Schools can redirect savings toward instructional priorities, facilities, or student services.

3. Access to Specialized Equipment and Disinfectants

Professional contractors invest in advanced cleaning tools and hospital-grade disinfectants that private schools often lack:

• HEPA-filter vacuums, electrostatic sprayers, steam cleaners
• EPA-registered disinfectants for viral and bacterial containment
• Proper dilution and disposal procedures for hazardous cleaning agents

Access to commercial-grade tools improves cleaning speed, surface coverage, and safety outcomes.

4. Scalable Staffing and Emergency Support

In times of increased risk (e.g., flu season, pandemics, post-outbreak recovery), outsourced providers can:

• Scale up staff quickly for after-hours or weekend sanitation
• Provide on-call support for disinfection or containment
• Offer substitute personnel during staff absences or turnover

Flexibility allows schools to respond to emerging health threats without compromising instructional hours or internal workloads.

5. Regulatory Compliance and Documentation

Outsourcing firms often provide:

• Service logs, inspection reports, and compliance checklists
• Staff trained in OSHA, EPA, and local health authority regulations
• Guidance for passing third-party inspections and meeting accreditation standards

Professional documentation reduces legal liability and builds confidence with parents and health authorities.

6. Higher Perceived Value Among Parents and Stakeholders

Parents paying tuition expect a clean, safe learning environment. Outsourcing allows schools to:

• Deliver visibly clean, odor-free, and well-stocked facilities
• Communicate sanitation protocols transparently in marketing and enrollment materials
• Address concerns proactively with auditable cleaning logs and protocols

Cleanliness becomes part of the school’s competitive advantage and brand reputation.

7. Focus on Core Competencies

By offloading sanitation responsibilities, school administrators and educators can:

• Focus on instructional leadership, student outcomes, and school culture
• Eliminate distractions related to staffing, supply management, or emergency cleanup
• Improve operational efficiency across campus departments

Outsourcing removes operational burdens so schools can prioritize educational excellence.

Implementation Best Practices for Private Schools

To realize the full benefits of outsourcing:

• Vet vendors thoroughly for licensing, references, and compliance records
• Define service-level agreements (SLAs) with clear performance standards
• Schedule routine inspections and feedback sessions to ensure alignment
• Maintain open communication between cleaning teams and school administrators

Outsourcing sanitation and hygiene services empowers private schools to meet rising health and safety expectations, reduce costs, and deliver a cleaner, healthier environment—without diverting focus from their core mission: education.

 

References

1. Gerrard, J., & Barron, R. (2020). Cleaning public education: the privatisation of school maintenance work. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 52, 21 - 9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2019.1689102
2. Christoffersen, H., Paldam, M., & Würtz, A. (2007). Public versus private production and economies of scale. Public Choice, 130, 311-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11127-006-9086-0
3. Bute, J., Gupta, T., & Chinchodkar, K. (2023). Basic Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) practices among school adolescents of rural area, Indore: A comparative study. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2023.8.1.0059
4. Joshi, J., & Agarwal, S. (2017). A comparative study of government and private schools for the facilities related to water hygiene. International journal of applied research, 3, 178-182 https://www.allresearchjournal.com/archives/2017/vol3issue9/PartC/3-9-30-388.pdf
5. El-Kased, R., & Gamaleldin, N. (2020). Prevalence of Bacteria in Primary Schools. https://doi.org/10.22207/jpam.14.4.39
6. , K., & Sumarmi, S. (2023). AVAILABILITY OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND CLEAN AND HEALTHY LIVING BEHAVIOR IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. The Indonesian Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.20473/ijph.v18i2.2023.253-264
7. Iqbal, M. (2012). Public versus Private Secondary Schools: A Qualitative Comparison. Journal of Research and Reflections, 6(1), 40–49. https://www.ue.edu.pk/jrre/articles/61004.pdf
8. Lu, Y., Bozlak, C., Bell, E., Khwaja, H. A., & Lin, S. (2023). A comparison study of environmental health related issues and policies between private and public U.S. schools using multi-level data. Hygiene and Environmental Health Advances, 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heha.2023.100079
9. Okihara, Y. (1978). Pupil Participation in School Cleaning: a comparative survey. Comparative Education, 14(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006780140104
10. Amoran, O. (2017). Healthful School Environment: A Comparative Study of Public and Private Primary Schools in Ogun State, Nigeria. Archives of Community Medicine and Public Health, 062–070. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5479.000027
11. Tahiroglu, M., & Esener, P. (2022). An Application for Gaining the Habit of Cleaning as a Value in Primary School Students: Clean Child - Dirty Child. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 9(3), 1377–1397. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1352282

 

Conclusion

Sanitation Is a Non-Negotiable Foundation for Learning

Clean, safe learning environments are not optional—they are essential.

Whether public or private, the condition of a school’s hygiene infrastructure directly impacts student health, attendance, academic performance, and long-term outcomes.

Key Takeaways

• Public schools face systemic barriers, including underfunded infrastructure, limited staff training, and irregular access to sanitation supplies.
• Private schools, while generally better resourced, benefit significantly from outsourcing sanitation services, allowing them to meet high cleanliness expectations and rapidly adapt to health crises.
• Infections, absenteeism, and hygiene-related stigma disproportionately affect students in underperforming sanitation environments—particularly girls and students in low-income areas.
• Outsourcing, targeted funding, and community engagement offer viable solutions to scale hygiene standards across all school types.

What Schools and Policymakers Must Prioritize

To close the hygiene gap and protect educational equity, schools must:

• Invest in infrastructure that supports consistent sanitation practices
• Adopt performance-based outsourcing models where feasible
• Embed hygiene culture into daily school life through education and leadership modeling
• Implement regular audits and accountability frameworks to ensure long-term compliance and improvement

The Path Forward

A clean school is more than a facility—it’s a promise to every student that their well-being matters.

By aligning funding, policy, culture, and operations, we can ensure that no child’s education is compromised by preventable hygiene challenges.

Let me know if you'd like this formatted into a closing slide, blog excerpt, or content block for web publishing.

Vanguard Cleaning Systems^® of the Ozarks' franchise-owned custodial service provider business cleans more than 8M sq. ft. weekly, maintaining an industry topping 95+% of its customer base, year-over-year, and boasting more than 60 5-star Google reviews.

Need more capability from your vendor partners? --Let's talk.

In Oklahoma, dial 918-960-4450

In Arkansas, dial 479-717-2410

In Missouri, dial 417-812-9777